Sunday, June 14, 2015
Reflection on blogging
I know I have not done all of my blog posts, and I regret that because blogging about reading has been very helpful. It keeps people posted on good and riveting books. Reading is one of the most important parts of life, and blogging about reading helped me read a lot more. I had a lot of positive and negative effects from blogging. For example blogging has given me time to actually reflect on books I have read. Instead of decoding the book, I have learned how to fully comprehend and interpret books on new and deeper senses. Blogging about reading has made me read more, I completed long thoughtful books that have changed me. The negative effects have been not being able to blogpost every week. Personally I don't imagine myself making another blog, only because I feel like blogging has been stressful and doesn't benefit me anymore. I think this year of blogging has helped me, but the things that it has helped me with are long term. I think blogging is not so different from writing in a notebook, but I prefer typing up a paper or writing in a notebook, because blogging is more of a time consumer. In conclusion, blogging has helped me this year, but I don't plan to blog again.
Monday, March 2, 2015
essay from post
Alec Mansky
805
YA blog post
“The curious incident of the dog in the nighttime” by Mark Haddon is a moving novel about a boy who gets caught in a tough situation with his parents. The narrator, who is the boy, appears to be on the autistic spectrum. In this story the boy, named Chris, lives with his dad and believes his mom is dead. Chris is also trying to solve the murder of his neighbor’s dog wellington. In the middle of the book Chris finds out that his mom is not dead and his dad killed the dog. These secrets confuse and hurt Chris ultimately putting his relationship with his father in jeopardy. This shows how key honesty is in our day to day relationships.
Honesty affected Chris; it affected his relationships with many different people. Towards the middle of the book, before Chris suspects anything, Chris finds a large amount of letters in his dad’s closet. After he reads the letters he says, “There was sick all over the bed and on my hands and arms and face.” (p. 113) Chris also says “I don’t know what happened then because there was a gap in my memory,” (p. 113) both of these parts of text shows how he doesn’t feel good and doesn’t feel normal. Also this unease derives from the fact that he is uniformed with a lot of different things. In addition, later on in the book Chris becomes scared of his dad and leaves to meet his mom in London. All of these feelings can show how honesty affected him, and how with help he powered through his fear.
Honesty affected his dad; it made Chris's dad's strongest relationship weak and made him sad and alone. For example, when Chris goes to London his dad searches for him and sobs when Chris rejects him. This proves how much Chris meant to his dad. Another example is after Chris reads the letters and his dad says, “ I’m sorry Christopher. I’m so, so sorry.” (p.114) and, “ We have to get you cleaned up, Ok?. . . Then I’m going to come back and take you to the bath room, Ok?” (p. 115) These reactions are his dad fearing losing Chris, which shows how special their relationship is to the dad. All of the help and assurance shows that the dad is panicking about his relationship with his son.
In conclusion, this story teaches us about the importance of honesty in your everyday relationships. Whether it’s a close friend, your best friend, or even your parents. Personally I was so connected to the dad and Chris's relationship thst I was angry when Chris left his dad, I was frustrated for the dad. This story tests Chris’s relationship but ultimately his relationship with his dad survives.
from http://alecssupercoolbookblog.blogspot.com/
Sunday, January 11, 2015
My response to Megan W.'s " One Fish, Two Fish, Red Fish, Blue fish- Social Action questions"
After looking through different blog post the instant I found this post I was intrigued. Not only is the post idea fascinating, but I learned how talented a writer Megan is. Megan's response to "One Fish, Two Fish, Red Fish, Blue fish" opened my eyes to new ideas about the Dr. Seuss's classic children's book. This post made me appreciate the lesson Dr. Seuss was subliminally teaching me as a kid, and how as a matured reader I can now appreciate his writing even more. But mainly, this taught me to appreciate Megan's writing even more. I thought this was an impeccable response.
What I admired about her poignant response was how she analyzed the children's book which we could all relate to. The most interesting aspect of this response is the way Megan incorporated the Social Action query; the text may have more depth then many of us expect, but the questions didn't seemed designed for the book. However, I thought Megan did an incredible job analyzing the text. Concurrently, Megan gave many realizations about the book I had read loads of times. And these are realizations I have only made now. I thought Megan's analyzing topped with her rich vocabulary.
In conclusion, Megan did amazing work that I was very impressed by. She has conveyed an incredible talent for writing and her writing alone has already given me tips for my future posts. However, nobody is a perfect writer. Some things she could work on in the future could be; correcting some grammar errors, combining instead of stringing out her ideas. All in all Megan's response was incredible and she showed amazing writing skill. Bravo Megan!
Sunday, January 4, 2015
Non-fiction critical analysis
"New Factor in Campus Sexual Assault Cases:
Counsel for the Accused," by Ariel Kaminer, is a fascinating article that
gives a new point of view to campus sexual assault cases. This article informs
readers about recent discoveries of victims of sexual cases setting up the
suspect. It also discusses how schools may be thinking they are handling sexual
assault on campus, but they are not looking into the case. This could lead to a
future large issue, and this article shows the little issues that are beginning
to happen.
One of the largest issues is the way some
schools have not been looking into the cases. For example at Colombia
University a student was suspended for a year, but later the student says that
the girl invited him in to have sex with her. Then later the girl says it
wasn’t consensual. No whether he or she was right is another story, but the
fact that the school didn’t take a closer look is a problem. In addition, in
October 2014 Harvard’s sexual misconduct policies governing punishment were
criticized by twenty-eight faculty members, for being biased against males. This
shows the failure in the sexual assault policies.
Another problem is the tough consequences
that colleges are giving students who might not be the suspects of sexual
assault cases. For example the student who goes Colombia University was
suspended for a year and wasn’t aloud to make his claim, of not committing
sexual assault. Also, a recent study found that more then one third of the
students who may have committed sexual assault on campus were expelled. Both of
these rules in college may hurt people’s degrees for the future even if they
didn’t sexually assault anyone.
Sunday, November 30, 2014
Blog post
“The Semplica Girls” by George Saunders a futuristic and poignant
comedy about a poor man dealing with his family issues. It is written in first
person as a diary. In this story he has a series of events that are joyous and
very tough. The main character tries to keep his family together and happy. One
thing I respect about the main character is his constant want to make his family
happy. Also, along with trying to make his family happy he also tries to stay
optimistic, and in the climax of the story his attempt to keep him and his
family happy is thwarted.
My
first example of his attempt to keep his family happy is when his family is
invited to his daughter’s rich friend’s birthday party. In this chapter he
tries to keep his family positive, but he doesn’t feel very positive himself.
For example, the title of the chapter is “most depressing birthday party.”
However, when his kids try to comment about the family’s poverty he reassures
them that they are doing okay financially. This shows his optimistic instinct.
Another example is after he flips on his
daughter for costing the family their house. “Its ok Eva, we are not gonna lose the house, I’m sorry for
shouting at you.” In this scene the inner dialogue is that he had to lie to Eva
because he couldn’t stand her being upset. This scene shows how the character
is an optimistic person, and how he has to keep his family optimistic, even if
that means lying.
In conclusion, I like this character
because he is optimistic, but I know that it could be an error as well. It is a
flaw in the instance that Eva will feel even worse if the house is lost and
especially when his kids realize all of the lies that he tells are lies and
they are in a tough financial position.
Wednesday, November 19, 2014
Argument Essay
Argument Essay on YA fiction
Young
adult fiction may no longer be Judy Blume’s “Superfudge,” but does that mean YA
fiction should be taken off shelves? Some, like Meghan Cox Gurdon, say that
today’s YA fiction books are, “Constantly reflecting back hideously distorted
portrayals of what life is.” [p.1 “Darkness Too Visible”]. However, many
support the idea that people should make their own decisions in what they read.
Current YA fiction should not be rated because it helps teenagers to mature and
learn. Teenagers should not be protected from reality.
All
across the world, kids mature by reading YA. Some say that current YA fiction
is graphic. While I acknowledge that some YA fiction can be profane, I agree
with Ms. Gurdon as she admits that, “Reading about homicide doesn’t turn a man
into a murderer; reading about cheating on exams won’t make a kid break the
honor code.”[p.1 “Darkness Too Visible”] In addition, like the Boone public
library says, “Books like ‘Scars’ or with questionable material, those provide teachable
moments for the family.”[p.3 “Darkness Too Visible”] The Boone public library proves
that profane material can be beneficial for families because it can lead to
having mature discussions about the graphic topics.
My
second point is how people ignore the profanity in the Internet or the news. I
understand how “Pederasty and incest and brutal beatings are now just part of
the run (in YA fiction),” [p.1 “Darkness Too visible”] but a teenager can
simply find all of these disturbing actions on the cover of the New York Times.
Like Patrick Ness, the best-selling kids’ author says, “Teenagers look at the
Internet, they look at the news, they look at pornography on the Internet.”[p.2
“Should Young Adult Books Have Age Ratings?”]
In addition, why
should teenagers be protected from the news and profane YA fiction. Are people
like M. Cox Gurdon trying to protect teens? Sherman Alexie states that, “they
(people opposed to YA fiction) aren’t trying to protect African-American teens
forced to walk through metal detectors on their way to school…No, they are
simply trying to protect their notions of what literature is and should be.”
[p.3 “Why the Best Kids Books are Written in Blood”] I agree with what Alexie
says, because in articles like Darkness Too Visible they never use quotes from
teenagers, and the teens are the readers.
My
third and final point is how teens should not have YA fiction taken away from
them, because YA fiction gets teens to read, and reading is important for thriving
in school. Many books can be gruesome and disgusting, for example ‘The Marbury
Lens,’ “Young Jack is drugged, abducted, and nearly raped.” [p.2 “Darkness Too
Visible”] Those kinds of books may not be for me, but some other person may
only like extremely graphic books, and that may be the only type of book that
gets that person to read. Like Sherman Alexie states, “As a child I read
because books- violent and not, blasphemous and not, terrifying and not- were
the most loving and trustworthy things in my life.” [p.4 “Why the Best Kids
Books are Written in Blood”] Alexie shows that teens like many different types
of YA fiction. In the end it’s the teens decision in what they read.
In conclusion,
YA fiction connects to teens. YA books mature, teach, entertain, and satisfy
teens. So do you honestly think that it should be up to people like M. Cox
Gurdon to choose for the teens what the teens read? So next time you see an
article that talks about how “awful” YA fiction is, think about the teens that
only the “awful” YA fiction.
Sunday, November 16, 2014
blog post on independent book
Blog Post
Safe
Area Gorazde by Joe Sacco is a remorseful and true group stories found from
refugees in Gorazde, Bosnia after a huge war. It follows the main character and
author Joe Sacco, who makes many friends, but also learns to empathize for
another side of the world. As the story goes on his new Bosnian friends try to
find out if the rest of the world cares about the war. In this story there are
a lot of trust problems.
The
first time the issue comes up about trust is when refugees start wondering if
the rest of the world was on top of this situation. Joe says “I said yes, which
I regret saying.” (p.121) The second time someone asks this question, it’s his
best friend. He then again lies and feels bad about it. He questions if it was
right or wrong because he feels bad.
The
second trust issue is when they wonder if people are coming to help clean up
the mess in the neighboring areas. Once again a similar process happens.
However I still question if the important white lie was necessary. He goes into
how he couldn’t bare telling the refugees that no one cared about them. Which
gives a deeper level to the text.
In
conclusion, this is a very powerful story that taught a lot of reader’s
different lesson. One is how a white lie can put a lot of faith into different
people. So do you think the white lie was necessary?
Monday, November 3, 2014
non fiction critical analysis
Critical analysis on “Why the best kids
books are written in blood”
This
article, by Sherman Alexie, is a direct response to Meghan Cox Gurdon’s article
from the wall street journal. Alexie rebuttals Gurdon’s article and writes
about how YA fiction should be mature. Well, why does Alexie think the best
kids books are written in blood? In the article he talks about how in his
childhood the elders tried to protect his innocence, he says, “They wanted to
protect me from sex when I had already been raped.” What Alexie is trying to
say is that YA fiction shouldn’t be banned and rated because kids should not be
protected from reality.
In
this article Alexie tries to make readers feel that kids who have troubling
lives can connect to books. He does this by telling true stories about him and
others and bringing the article to a very personal level. For example, he talks
about being abused and how, “ I read because books—were the most loving and
trustworthy things in my life.” In addition he also talks about how people who
criticize YA fiction “ aren’t trying to protect the poor from poverty…No they
are simply trying to protect their privileged notions of what literature is and
should be.”
In
conclusion, I agree with Sherman Alexie on how kids should not be protected from
profane literature. I may be a kid and I may want independence in what I read,
but I agree that reading does mature kids. From firsthand experience most of my
knowledge is from reading. I love to read and I know that it helps kids. People
can say that books are too graphic, but in the end it’s the readers choice; and
others cannot make that choice for the reader.
Sunday, October 19, 2014
YA blogpost
Alec Mansky
805
YA blog post
“The
curious incident of the dog in the nighttime” by Mark Haddon is a moving novel
about a boy who gets caught in a tough situation with his parents. The
narrator, who is the boy, appears to be on the autistic spectrum. In this story
the boy, named Chris, lives with his dad and believes his mom is dead. Chris is
also trying to solve the murder of his neighbor’s dog wellington. In the middle
of the book Chris finds out that his mom is not dead and his dad killed the
dog. These secrets confuse and hurt Chris ultimately putting his relationship
with his father in jeopardy. This story taught readers the importance of
honesty and how it can affect different relationships.
Honesty affected Chris; it made him
uneasy and scared. Towards the middle of the book, before Chris suspects
anything, Chris finds a large amount of letters in his dad’s closet. After he
reads the letters he says, “There was sick all over the bed and on my hands and
arms and face.” (p. 113) Chris also says “I don’t know what happened then
because there was a gap in my memory,” (p. 113) both of these parts of text
shows how he doesn’t feel good and doesn’t feel normal. In addition, later on
in the book Chris becomes scared of his dad and leaves to meet his mom in
London.
Honesty
affected his dad; it made his strongest relationship weak and made him sad and
alone. For example, when Chris goes to London his dad searches for him and sobs
when Chris rejects him. Another example is after Chris reads the letters and his
dad says, “ I’m sorry Christopher. I’m so, so sorry.” (p.114) and, “ We have to
get you cleaned up, Ok?. . . Then I’m going to come back and take you to the
bath room, Ok?” (p. 115) all of the help and assurance shows that the dad is
panicking about his relationship with his son.
In
conclusion, this story teaches us about the importance of honesty in your
everyday relationships. Whether it’s a close friend, your best friend, or even
your parents. This story tests Chris’s relationship but ultimately his
relationship with his dad survives
Thursday, October 9, 2014
baseline argument essay
Michael Brown was shot and killed over the summer. That may not sound like much because lots of people die everyday, but this killing has a lot more to it. On August 9th, the black eighteen year old, Michael Brown, was shot by a white police officer for "unclear circumstances," says upfront magazine. This controversial topic is being questioned right now by thousands of people, they ask themselves; was this killing based off of racist assumptions by the white police officer? I think it was a racist action. There are many reasons I think this was a racist assumption, but I have stuck to two main reasons; firstly, he had no weapon, in addition nobody knows why he was shot, and finally, there has been past patterns of this kind of incident.
My first point I want to make is how he had no weapons. Most deaths caused by the police are because the policeman or woman is trying to protect citizens, but in this case who was the policeman protecting? In addition, hypothetically if Brown had a weapon, the policeman still shouldn't shoot him, let alone kill him. The fact is, there has to be serious measures before a policeman shoots a civilian and in this situation there were no measures. Was Brown killed because of fear? I also want to point out that nobody knows why he was killed. When I add these two thoughts I can infer that most likely some racists thoughts and assumptions were made and the cop decided to shoot.
My second and final point is how this incident is not a first. For example, on February 26th 2012, Trayvon Martin was shot and killed by George Zimmerman. It was a similar case, Trayvon Martin was just walking when George Zimmerman shot him. Martin had no weapons, he was seventeen. Weirdly enough, Zimmerman was released from jail for the shooting, but later put back in for threatening his wife. Also, white police men in the early 1900s have been known to be quite racists and hurt innocent black civilians. Frankly, it hasn't even been one hundred years since black people were desegregated. Racist stereotypes has most definitely effected present day life.
In conclusion, this problem is controversial, but I still think it was a racist decision. This problem has effected many different people's thoughts on the police. Young black men have been questioning walking around in the street, should they be scared to walk in the street. I think they shouldn't have to be scared, but at this point I don't see why they wouldn't be scared.
My first point I want to make is how he had no weapons. Most deaths caused by the police are because the policeman or woman is trying to protect citizens, but in this case who was the policeman protecting? In addition, hypothetically if Brown had a weapon, the policeman still shouldn't shoot him, let alone kill him. The fact is, there has to be serious measures before a policeman shoots a civilian and in this situation there were no measures. Was Brown killed because of fear? I also want to point out that nobody knows why he was killed. When I add these two thoughts I can infer that most likely some racists thoughts and assumptions were made and the cop decided to shoot.
My second and final point is how this incident is not a first. For example, on February 26th 2012, Trayvon Martin was shot and killed by George Zimmerman. It was a similar case, Trayvon Martin was just walking when George Zimmerman shot him. Martin had no weapons, he was seventeen. Weirdly enough, Zimmerman was released from jail for the shooting, but later put back in for threatening his wife. Also, white police men in the early 1900s have been known to be quite racists and hurt innocent black civilians. Frankly, it hasn't even been one hundred years since black people were desegregated. Racist stereotypes has most definitely effected present day life.
In conclusion, this problem is controversial, but I still think it was a racist decision. This problem has effected many different people's thoughts on the police. Young black men have been questioning walking around in the street, should they be scared to walk in the street. I think they shouldn't have to be scared, but at this point I don't see why they wouldn't be scared.
Sunday, October 5, 2014
Faithful Elephants Book Response
Reading Response on Faithful Elephants
“Faithful
Elephants” by Yukio Tsuchiyan is a poignant and true short story about an
elephant trainer from the Japan in the 1940s. He is forced to watch his
favorite elephants starve and he is not allowed to help them. The elephants
John, Tonky, and Wanly, had to be killed because the Americans had been bombing
Japan and the government was scared that if the zoo was bombed the animals
would run free and hurt citizens. This story teaches readers about the
desperate times during war, the unwilling yet obedient trainer , and the sad
situation the trainer was in which was like a parent who cannot protect their
child. This story has a very deep theme: the constant challenge of not always
being able to protect your loved ones. In this tale the readers learn a tough
lesson that awful things happen during war.
In
this story the readers can tell how much the trainer loved the elephants. For
example, in the beginning of the story the narrator says, “One day, an employee
of the zoo, while tenderly polishing
the stone, told me a sad story of three elephants buried there.” [p. 1] Also at
the end of the story, the narrator says, “He was still patting the tombstone tenderly.” [p. 3 ] I noted the “tender”
actions of the trainer. I think this shows the trainer’s tender love for John,
Tonky, and Wanly. Another example of the trainer’s love for the Elephants is at
the end after he finishes telling the story, “With tears in his eyes, the
zookeeper finished the story.” This shows that the emotions were still raw and
the trainer hadn’t moved on. All of these actions and small observations show
how much the trainer loved the Elephants.
The trainer loved the elephants
incredibly, even though that couldn’t stop the government, that didn’t stop him
from trying to save the elephants. For example, when the trainer found out that
the elephants had to be killed he suggested that the elephants should be sent
to Sendai, a place far north of Tokyo, but the government responded by saying,
“what if the bombs fell on Sendai?” [p. 2] Another example is when Tonky and
Wanly were about to die from starvation, “The trainer could stand it no
longer…He carried food and pails of water to them and threw it at their feet.”
[p. 2] all of these actions show the unwillingness of the trainer yet by the
end the elephants still die.
In conclusion, all of these observations
and actions show the trainer being tested with a hard challenge: not always
being able to protect your loved ones. At the end of this story the trainer and
the narrator and even the reader learn a tough lesson, which is that awful
things happen during war.
Sunday, September 14, 2014
Book response on summer book
BOOK RESPONSE ON EVERYDAY
Every
day by David Levithan is a Young Adult novel about a world where there is a
species of people who travel in different bodies every day, hence the name “Every Day.” This book follows a sixteen year old who belongs this species.
This boy, named A, falls in love with a human girl named Rhiannon. While he’s
trying to make this relationship work, another boy named Nathan finds out about
A, and he tries to hunt him down. I enjoyed this book although I did see some
flaws in it. One of the things I enjoyed about the book, is that the
character’s emotions and flaws were very realistic even though it was a
Science-Fiction novel. In the book I thought A’s flaws were realistic. One of
A’s flaws is that he is very needy. One example is how he would do whatever he
could to get closer to Rhiannon, even if it messed with the life of the body he
was borrowing at that time. Although many could argue he is in love. Also, I
felt that the characters were complex. For example, even though I supported
most of his actions I still found some that I didn’t agree with, because you
cannot agree with every action from the main character. As much as I enjoyed
the book there were some things I didn’t like. For example I felt the book was
pretty cheesy, and that was not so realistic. Also I don’t think that the
reactions of Rhiannon finding out about A did not seem natural. However in
conclusion, I thought that all in all the good parts outweighed the bad parts,
and it was a good
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)