Argument Essay on YA fiction
Young
adult fiction may no longer be Judy Blume’s “Superfudge,” but does that mean YA
fiction should be taken off shelves? Some, like Meghan Cox Gurdon, say that
today’s YA fiction books are, “Constantly reflecting back hideously distorted
portrayals of what life is.” [p.1 “Darkness Too Visible”]. However, many
support the idea that people should make their own decisions in what they read.
Current YA fiction should not be rated because it helps teenagers to mature and
learn. Teenagers should not be protected from reality.
All
across the world, kids mature by reading YA. Some say that current YA fiction
is graphic. While I acknowledge that some YA fiction can be profane, I agree
with Ms. Gurdon as she admits that, “Reading about homicide doesn’t turn a man
into a murderer; reading about cheating on exams won’t make a kid break the
honor code.”[p.1 “Darkness Too Visible”] In addition, like the Boone public
library says, “Books like ‘Scars’ or with questionable material, those provide teachable
moments for the family.”[p.3 “Darkness Too Visible”] The Boone public library proves
that profane material can be beneficial for families because it can lead to
having mature discussions about the graphic topics.
My
second point is how people ignore the profanity in the Internet or the news. I
understand how “Pederasty and incest and brutal beatings are now just part of
the run (in YA fiction),” [p.1 “Darkness Too visible”] but a teenager can
simply find all of these disturbing actions on the cover of the New York Times.
Like Patrick Ness, the best-selling kids’ author says, “Teenagers look at the
Internet, they look at the news, they look at pornography on the Internet.”[p.2
“Should Young Adult Books Have Age Ratings?”]
In addition, why
should teenagers be protected from the news and profane YA fiction. Are people
like M. Cox Gurdon trying to protect teens? Sherman Alexie states that, “they
(people opposed to YA fiction) aren’t trying to protect African-American teens
forced to walk through metal detectors on their way to school…No, they are
simply trying to protect their notions of what literature is and should be.”
[p.3 “Why the Best Kids Books are Written in Blood”] I agree with what Alexie
says, because in articles like Darkness Too Visible they never use quotes from
teenagers, and the teens are the readers.
My
third and final point is how teens should not have YA fiction taken away from
them, because YA fiction gets teens to read, and reading is important for thriving
in school. Many books can be gruesome and disgusting, for example ‘The Marbury
Lens,’ “Young Jack is drugged, abducted, and nearly raped.” [p.2 “Darkness Too
Visible”] Those kinds of books may not be for me, but some other person may
only like extremely graphic books, and that may be the only type of book that
gets that person to read. Like Sherman Alexie states, “As a child I read
because books- violent and not, blasphemous and not, terrifying and not- were
the most loving and trustworthy things in my life.” [p.4 “Why the Best Kids
Books are Written in Blood”] Alexie shows that teens like many different types
of YA fiction. In the end it’s the teens decision in what they read.
In conclusion,
YA fiction connects to teens. YA books mature, teach, entertain, and satisfy
teens. So do you honestly think that it should be up to people like M. Cox
Gurdon to choose for the teens what the teens read? So next time you see an
article that talks about how “awful” YA fiction is, think about the teens that
only the “awful” YA fiction.